Thursday, July 16, 2009

Black Silver And Maroon Wedding

PD: Democratic Party or fear of ...?


Beppe Grillo on his blog:
The Board of Guarantee PD gave me a fatwa: " It 's not possible to register Beppe Grillo nell'anagrafe the Democratic Party because 'he inspires and recognizes himself in a political movement hostile to the PD. The resolution will' be announced on the website in the coming days''.
In one sentence admitted that:
1. there is a popular political movement
2. this movement is " hostile" to the PD
3. if a citizen can join or not to PD (where D stands for Democrat) is decided by one imaginary guarantee fee, not the State
The "Hostile Political Movement" is hostile to it because its program is the alternative to the PDL? While that of PD but is equal to that of PDL ?.
The PD is hostile to renewables, hostile to the restoration of a direct vote of the candidate, hostile to the Clean Parliament, hostile to zero waste, hostile to the spread of the network and its free access, water hostile public opinion, hostile to a maximum of two legislatures for deputies and senators hostile to inquiries Forleo and De Magistris , hostile all topics covered in the Charter of Florence .
The PD is rather favorable to incineration all'indulto a good memory, concessions for three national television donated by D'Alema Violante and the psycho-dwarf, employment of the party by an oligarchy, water privatized, conflicts of interest to nuclear power, the militarization of Vicenza, with a doubling of the base of the Mill, the Lodo Alfano, contributions to publishing, employment of RAI by the parties.
The "Hostile Political Movement" is the exact opposite of the PD-level program, if you can talk to the PD program, not tactics a handful of people seeking employment. I remember, for example, that Fassino and his wife have accumulated 13 legislatures. How many millions of euro cost us and with what results for the citizens?
The "Hostile Political Movement" is hostile only to the twenty people, by the Bersani Melandri, who assume to represent the will of millions of Italians and despise the civil society who participated in the Vday and forty elected councilors in the municipalities with Browse Five Star .
The "Hostile Political Movement" is not hostile to those who vote PD, is not hostile to the teaching of Berlinguer .
The "Hostile Political Movement" is hostile to a small group of people that like the pigs in "Animal Farm " animals are more equal than others and take advantage of the good faith and lack of alternatives for millions of citizens well, is hostile to those who put the thief in his Pantheon Bottino Craxi private.
I have not been registered, are not worthy, I can not run for a program with a secretary. This was decided by a commission. Who elected this committee? Who are its members? Just ask the Secretary Giampietro Sestini, mail: giampietrosestini@yahoo.it . A question
Bersani: " Bassolino investigated in Naples as are you? And definitely convicted Carra is your deputy? . "They never give up (but the interest?). We even

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

How To Make Skin Lighter Fast On Bikini Area

GB: ANOTHER FAILURE


For perhaps Berlusconi has been a success (the media), but for Africa, our planet and people flesh and blood who suffer the burden of the crisis, the G8 Aquila has been a resounding failure.


appropriations for Africa (up from 25 to 15 to settle back down to 20 billion dollars) are nothing that recycled goods (and a bit 'out of order) of the promises made at G8 Glenagles and, before that, the Millennium Assembly United Nations in 2000 (and other international events). We do not know who this money and how we collect and where they will be, or how - if found - will be spent. The climate agreement is below the expectations of the United Nations and its Secretary-General if they complained publicly. Set at between 41 years (in 2050) the objective of reducing greenhouse gases is the most convenient way to buy time, only to revise downwards the targets now set, as they will prove unworkable. The full-blown fight against tax havens and unusual profits of the oil is a pure statement of principle. And "people first" (first person) is just an empty slogan to hide the lack of real measures to tackle the global financial and economic crisis. For new trade rules can be found at the summit in Doha in 2010. And the emphasis is that the markets continue to remain "open" (never, protectionism!), Not that hard and strict rules are established to avoid the financial casino that has dominated in recent years undisturbed. "Rights" of the market it comes far and wide in the G8 statement, the rights of labor there is no trace.
The G8 continues to be a useless club (the world) and indeed often harmful. Ineffective in regulating the global political and environmental development and equally ineffective in a common front to meet a financial and economic crisis without precedent in the Second World War. With an operation of political and media make-up the G8 widens - as the days - G14 to G20 and then, but in essence nothing changes. Developing countries remain at the window, but most are kept out of port 180 and passes the other countries on whose head falls some decisions taken by the G8. The UN is isolated and marginalized, out of the game, and yet are the only ones entitled to take part.
The call - in the final declaration - to follow the example of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and a commitment to create conditions for a world without nuclear weapons "sounds a bit 'strange to the ears of those who aspire to peace. Surely right. But while working to create "conditions" in a world without nuclear weapons, the G8 forget to tell us that every year we spend over 1.2 trillion dollars on weapons (80% from the G8 countries) and sufficient reduce military spending by 4% worldwide to have twice the money earmarked for Africa. For Africa
of money have been allocated in recent years. In words. In fact, the Millennium Development Goals - for lack of resources - have since failed and Berlusconi's promise came in promising to reduce by 56% funding for development cooperation in the last financial, bringing to 0.11% the percentage of GDP allocated to poor countries. To claim the "success" of the G8 is absolute hypocrisy in the face of so many thousands of people dying of hunger and disease in Africa - and the millions of workers who lose their jobs - which are made continuous promises are not kept . The G8 has become an old tool of the years of neoliberalism. It 's time to change course, to return to the United Nations and to the idea of \u200b\u200ba different world based on peace, democracy, economy of Justice. Obviously this was not discussed at the G8.