Baby Hulkhogan Costume

that thin, HUGE DIFFERENCE ...

Why can not a person left to vote in European elections Di Pietro

of Vittorio Agnoletto (MEP PRC / EL) from "Il Manifesto" of May 3, 2009 In recent weeks I have heard quite a few people left IdV intending to vote, and this same intention was represented several times in the pages of this newspaper for several readers. The 6 / 7 June, will vote for the European Parliament and Di Pietro has announced that all elected representatives in Brussels will be in the IDV group, "Liberals and Democrats," the same group who has been writing the same Di Pietro quand ' MEP was. To assess whether it is compatible with a left militancy claimed the vote in European elections for the IDV, I think the best thing is to analyze the behavior that the Liberals took to the main directives in the last legislature. In the field of social policies and the working group's Liberal Cast: * in favor of the Bolkestein, who is a veritable incitement to social dumping and competition between workers to fall within the EU; * for the directive that would have extended business hours until 65 hours week and on some occasions up to 78, a directive that for now, we can not reject; * in favor of the resolution on the work, which punishes more victims and perpetrators. And it provides for employers who employ illegal labor by immigrants without a residence permit, but only fines and for the immediate expulsion of migrants themselves (unless they are minors or who can demonstrate that they are victims of trafficking) . A real incentive illegal employment of immigrants: who will do most of them complain? The Liberals have also voted in favor of the directive of "shame" that includes: the ability to lock in cpt / cie migrants without a residence permit, but without having committed any offense, including 18 (6 +12 ) months, the return of migrants in countries different from them, eg. Coming could be repatriated from Sudan to Libya, in cpt Gheddaffi in the desert, and the repatriation of unaccompanied minors provided they have relatives in their country also can not be far away .... maybe then so difficult to understand why 10 MPs IDV abstained on the bill Security in the Italian Parliament! In foreign policy, without rage, I just remember the vote in favor of the resolution on strengthening the role of NATO in the security policies of the EU. To those who argue that everything depends on who, in the list, will be elected, I would say that it is best to think of it before: it can easily happen (and not only nell'IdV) and give preference to someone who is against free trade and it contributes to elect, with their vote, an MP on the same list ready to support the Working Time Directive when the Council, as announced, the recur. is also good to know that in Strasbourg on the work of individual Member depends almost entirely on the relationship with the parliamentary group of belonging. Individual initiatives have almost no space. 's more than pleased with legitimate claims against those launching large Berlusconi, ever more useful in the deserts of our current Italian Parliament, but not enough, you must go and see him practicing what concrete social choices. And based on my experience of five years to the European Parliament, I think one person left, and that this should be on 6 / 7 June can not vote on the IDV.