the right to strike within two years, the threshold 50% of representativeness of trade unions for
a proclamation and, finally, a requirement of a referendum prior to the abbreviations that they do at least 20% of representation and that, to take to the streets, they must obtain at least 30% of the vote at the junction between the workers. These summarize the key points of the bill that was approved yesterday by the Council of Ministers proposed by the Labour Minister Maurizio Sacconi.
So, contrary to the announcement, the Consolidation will not only regulate the transport, a true mirror of the larks of discomfort with the topic of citizens, but will extend to all sectors. The same president of Confindustria, Emma Marcegaglia yesterday demanded, especially the part about the referendum. In return you ready to open to the idea of \u200b\u200brepresentation in the private sector. The anthology
minister "anti-strike" does not end here.
Among other provisions, it is expected
stop an announcement effect, fines up to € 5 000 for wild protests and ban for anyone to block roads and airports. Finally, greater use of conciliation and arbitration powers in the newly organized Commission for labor relations (former Commission Act 146). In some services or activities "of major importance" in order to strike will, then, an individual membership and prevention. This statement will be governed by contract. The strike is virtual, but the wording is returned to the bargaining. You may be required for those categories, whose absence from work, determines "the practical impossibility of providing the service main and essential." For the revocation of a strike will have "a good time," and the withdrawal will be possible only at the last minute before a final agreement. New rules are laid down on a strike and minimum intervals between each other and the combination of stops incurred in the same catchment area. The Guarantee Committee on strikes becomes Relations Committee to work with nature, responsibilities and functions of arbitration and conciliation, "even mandatory for the labor unrest. " Among the tasks is to 'ascertain' participation in the strikes, with ad hoc monitoring and on conflict than on representativeness.
Duro remarks by the PRC. According to the secretary Paolo Ferrero,
'you are putting into question' the right to strike on a national scale. " "The political truth behind the request to limit the right to strike is, however, another - continuous Ferrero - namely, that after the government put the muzzle
courts, wants to put workers, realizing
The Democratic Rebirth Plan P2.
Codacons, "the only association of consumers in these years has fought against wildcat strikes, "warns the government" not to use the excuse of consumers to violate the Constitution. " The organization of consumers think, in fact, that is sufficient "two people because a strike is legitimate and there's extreme collective abstention."
strong opposition even from John Pagliarini, head of the PDCI job invoking 'extraordinary mobilization to stop the project reactionary and unconstitutional fielded by the government. " "The design is an example of Berlusconi - says the former chairman of the House Labor Committee - are exploited to the needs of citizens, to which the institutions can not answer for their inability to directly attacking the rights and those who work to make them enforceable. Parliament will be asked only to ratify what has been decided elsewhere by a crude and unpopular government, which wants to put in a bad light in advance those who, today or tomorrow, wanted to complain without lowering his head. "
The union (see article below) and the Democratic Party, do not seem very fascinated by the mobilization against the law after all freedom. The only objection is a procedural move.
The right to strike is "not a subject on which you are working with enabling legislation. It is a matter on which action is taken through a negotiation with social partners, "said Massimo D'Alema.
The former trade unionist, now Parliamentary Assembly of the Democratic Party, Paul Nerozzi, no substantive objections to the text of the government. Asks first, "the agreement by the confederal unions' and then he complains that the instrument of delegated legislation" to deal with such a sensitive issue and it would be necessary with a drawing primarily the result of an agreement with trade unions and a wide-ranging parliamentary debate that did not contain so delegated to the future government. "
Who seems more deeply on the merits is Pier Paolo Baretta, a lawmaker of the Democratic Party and former secretary general of the CISL, which fears an extension of the rules to all sectors. If the right to do, he says, should be from a Send the result of an agreement between the unions. Baretta also criticized the threshold to declare the strike, "the decision to strike a majority - said the former union leader - is linked to the situation, the balance of power and this puzzles me. The problem is more related to the representation, the presence in the transport of many small symbols crushed. "
Even the former Minister Cesare Damiano calls on the Government to review the thresholds. "For example - he explains - the threshold for the referendum set at 20% is too high. When they spoke of thresholds, in conjunction with trade union representation has always shown a 5% ". In addition, he wants assurances that the text will apply only to transport and, above all, to transform the enabling act in a normal bill. "A law exists - Damian remembers - and you can improve if there was an excess of conflict and contrast. After that is a step that the government references to the bargaining so the virtual strike because the individual membership: the latter provision, then, I is not, because it compresses the law. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment