(Edmondo Berselli)
That reform is a suicide barrier on the European
The advantage for Berlusconi. But the Democratic Party would be a disaster
reappeared on the political scene that the proposed reform of the electoral law for the European Parliament. Then it sinks, reappears and reappears again. If it disappears tomorrow, the next day reappear. Strange. There are no criteria governabilit: There is no structural reason, or 'systemic', to reform the leggeà be met. At most it may be that between electoral systems in the same country there should be a basic similarity, but is weak reasoning, especially if they relied on four elettorale.Quindi months after the consultation, rather than political scene where the ghost comes back the reform, we should speak of the market between the parties. Change the law, with a barrier of 4 percent, as alleged in the Democratic Party, or 5, says Silvio Berlusconi, is liable only for reasons of convenience and political expediency. Does the Democratic Party certainly , he sees before him the nightmare of an erosion of the consensus that is sent to the wreck on the same project 'democrat' . It is also convenient to the PDL and Berlusconi, although, as we shall see, for reasons entirely different from those of Pd.Naturalmente not convenient at all forces have lost the general elections of 2008, ie Former Rainbow Left parties. The next opponent is going through a time of exceptionally serious and profound restructuring since the split of the Communist Refoundation implemented by Nichi Vendola. Under these conditions the barrier is simply the political will to annihilate the forces outside the Democratic Party, and probably the mortification of the whole idea that keeps quell'elettorato critical of society and economy of advanced voting mercato.Altro that useful, as last April. This would apply gently to the left ultras and say we will do out of politics, but given that we do it for your sake, and for the good of the center-left perspective reformist. So I strangled, but without malice, gently, kindly and compassionate euthanasia that does not need to say no .
now, except that if the dam was really to 5 percent as indicated Berlusconi could go even at the risk of the UDC Casini (and here is the clear intention of hurting Berlusconi), and would also concern in Italy of values, it would be right to know, first, in which the modern system will change the rules of comparison four months before the vote. Second point: what are the real reasons that lead Berlusconi to encourage an agreement with the Democratic Party? Not the right growth of parties or small parties as an alternative to the PDL, which may represent a pinprick but certainly not an alternative. What we understand, rather, the premier is made uneasy by the possible implosion of Veltroni's party. Has now become a politician in the round, he knows the mechanisms that govern the lives of the existence of political parties and coalitions. If the Democratic Party actually collapse, within the PDL and counter-pressures manifest themselves even stronger than at present, which would put at risk the quality of everything, already poor, the action of governo.Quindi there is a convergent interest among Pdl and Pd, haste to reform the electoral formula. But at least by the Democrats, before taking any guidance, you should look at a political strategy. And then it should be noted that the design based on 'majority vocation' of the Democratic Party has stalled. In summary: an alternative to Berlusconi is possible only by enlarging the alliance. Call Olive, call Union, call it another way, the competitiveness of the left can not be separated from the aggregation of cultures and political structures outside the Democratic Party, the center and left. In this light, the dam would mean the election of any potential strategic reset, would necessarily have consequences on local government, opens the way to the idea of \u200b\u200ba damn contract signed with Berlusconi. You want to tell the Democratic Party: courage, do it. Make this reform tattered and politically suicidal. Then go read one of the "fundamental laws of human stupidity" described by historian Charles M. Onion in a memorable book: the stupid one who does evil to others without obtaining an advantage, indeed, hurting even himself. Perfect forward with the dam, Democrats.
The advantage for Berlusconi. But the Democratic Party would be a disaster
reappeared on the political scene that the proposed reform of the electoral law for the European Parliament. Then it sinks, reappears and reappears again. If it disappears tomorrow, the next day reappear. Strange. There are no criteria governabilit: There is no structural reason, or 'systemic', to reform the leggeà be met. At most it may be that between electoral systems in the same country there should be a basic similarity, but is weak reasoning, especially if they relied on four elettorale.Quindi months after the consultation, rather than political scene where the ghost comes back the reform, we should speak of the market between the parties. Change the law, with a barrier of 4 percent, as alleged in the Democratic Party, or 5, says Silvio Berlusconi, is liable only for reasons of convenience and political expediency. Does the Democratic Party certainly , he sees before him the nightmare of an erosion of the consensus that is sent to the wreck on the same project 'democrat' . It is also convenient to the PDL and Berlusconi, although, as we shall see, for reasons entirely different from those of Pd.Naturalmente not convenient at all forces have lost the general elections of 2008, ie Former Rainbow Left parties. The next opponent is going through a time of exceptionally serious and profound restructuring since the split of the Communist Refoundation implemented by Nichi Vendola. Under these conditions the barrier is simply the political will to annihilate the forces outside the Democratic Party, and probably the mortification of the whole idea that keeps quell'elettorato critical of society and economy of advanced voting mercato.Altro that useful, as last April. This would apply gently to the left ultras and say we will do out of politics, but given that we do it for your sake, and for the good of the center-left perspective reformist. So I strangled, but without malice, gently, kindly and compassionate euthanasia that does not need to say no .
now, except that if the dam was really to 5 percent as indicated Berlusconi could go even at the risk of the UDC Casini (and here is the clear intention of hurting Berlusconi), and would also concern in Italy of values, it would be right to know, first, in which the modern system will change the rules of comparison four months before the vote. Second point: what are the real reasons that lead Berlusconi to encourage an agreement with the Democratic Party? Not the right growth of parties or small parties as an alternative to the PDL, which may represent a pinprick but certainly not an alternative. What we understand, rather, the premier is made uneasy by the possible implosion of Veltroni's party. Has now become a politician in the round, he knows the mechanisms that govern the lives of the existence of political parties and coalitions. If the Democratic Party actually collapse, within the PDL and counter-pressures manifest themselves even stronger than at present, which would put at risk the quality of everything, already poor, the action of governo.Quindi there is a convergent interest among Pdl and Pd, haste to reform the electoral formula. But at least by the Democrats, before taking any guidance, you should look at a political strategy. And then it should be noted that the design based on 'majority vocation' of the Democratic Party has stalled. In summary: an alternative to Berlusconi is possible only by enlarging the alliance. Call Olive, call Union, call it another way, the competitiveness of the left can not be separated from the aggregation of cultures and political structures outside the Democratic Party, the center and left. In this light, the dam would mean the election of any potential strategic reset, would necessarily have consequences on local government, opens the way to the idea of \u200b\u200ba damn contract signed with Berlusconi. You want to tell the Democratic Party: courage, do it. Make this reform tattered and politically suicidal. Then go read one of the "fundamental laws of human stupidity" described by historian Charles M. Onion in a memorable book: the stupid one who does evil to others without obtaining an advantage, indeed, hurting even himself. Perfect forward with the dam, Democrats.
January 30, 2009
0 comments:
Post a Comment